NT Use of OT: Study Guide

The New Testament (NT) heavily references the Old Testament (OT), with over 295 direct citations and numerous allusions, forming about 10% of its content. This connection is key to understanding biblical texts and theology. NT authors used three main methods to interpret the OT:

• Single Meaning: Focuses on the OT's original context and meaning.
• Reinterpretation: Views OT passages through a Christ-centered lens.
• Typological: Identifies patterns in the OT that foreshadow Christ.

Quick Overview:

Each method offers unique insights into how NT writers connected OT scriptures to Jesus's life, death, and resurrection. This guide explores these methods, their features, examples, and practical applications to enrich your biblical study.

The New Testament Use of the Old Testament

1. Single Meaning Method

The Single Meaning Method is a key principle in interpreting the New Testament (NT) and helps ensure biblical accuracy. This approach emphasizes that Old Testament (OT) texts retain their original meaning when referenced in the NT. Rooted in the historical-grammatical method, it asserts that the meaning of a biblical passage is fixed and does not evolve over time.

This method is built on several core principles:

• Historical Context: The meaning of a text is anchored in its historical setting and the author's original intent.
• Grammatical Analysis: Understanding the original language and literary structure helps reveal the intended meaning.
• Consistent Interpretation: A passage's meaning remains stable across both the OT and NT.
• Original Context Study: Exploring the historical and cultural background establishes the foundational meaning.
• Author's Intent Analysis: The use of grammar and literary devices uncovers the message the author intended to convey.
• Modern Application: While the original meaning remains unchanged, it can be applied to contemporary contexts without altering its interpretation.

The importance of this method is emphasized by scholars like Milton Terry, who wrote:

"A fundamental principle in grammatico-historical exposition is that words and sentences can have but one signification in one and the same connection. The moment we neglect this principle we drift out upon a sea of uncertainty and conjecture."

Walter Kaiser also supports this idea with his concept of "Single Meaning, Unified Referents". He argues that when NT writers quote OT passages, they retain the original meaning while revealing new applications that align with the original context.

The Single Meaning Method ensures that interpretation remains objective by grounding it in historical context. It promotes consistency across different time periods and reinforces the clarity of God's intended message. As Dr. Mike Lester succinctly puts it:

"It [the context of a biblical passage] cannot mean what it never meant."

2. Reinterpretation Method

Building on the foundation of the Single Meaning Method, the Reinterpretation Method takes a step further by uncovering deeper, Christ-centered meanings within Old Testament (OT) texts. This approach highlights how New Testament (NT) authors bring new significance to OT passages through the lens of Jesus's life and mission.

Key Features of the Reinterpretation Method

New Testament Lens: NT writers approached OT texts with a perspective shaped by Jesus's life, death, and resurrection. This transformative viewpoint allowed them to perceive layers of meaning that extended beyond the original context.

Theological Framing: The NT authors reinterpreted OT scriptures by centering them on Jesus as the Messiah. They identified connections between ancient prophecies and their fulfillment in Christ's story.

Examples of Reinterpretation in the New Testament

Matthew's Use of Hosea: In Matthew 2:15, the Gospel writer references Hosea 11:1, "Out of Egypt I called my son", to describe Jesus's return from Egypt. While Hosea originally referred to Israel's exodus, Matthew sees this as a foreshadowing of Jesus's life, giving the verse a deeper, Christ-centered meaning.

Paul's View of Abraham's Seed: In Galatians 3:16, Paul reinterprets the promise of "seed" made to Abraham. Rather than applying it to the nation of Israel, Paul focuses it specifically on Christ, emphasizing Jesus as the ultimate fulfillment of this promise.

Addressing Criticism and Affirming the Approach

While some critics dismiss this method as mere "proof texting", many scholars argue that it reveals how Jesus fulfills OT prophecies in profound ways. By carefully considering the original OT context alongside its NT application, this method illustrates how early Christians connected their heritage to Jesus's ministry and recognized him as the promised Messiah.

Together with the Single Meaning and Typological approaches, the Reinterpretation Method offers a robust framework for understanding how NT authors engaged with and reimagined OT texts.

sbb-itb-2bcab02

3. Typological Method

The Typological Method highlights how New Testament writers, consistent with the rich symbolism of the Old Testament, identified patterns and symbols that pointed forward to Christ. This method views biblical history as deliberately structured, with earlier events acting as "types" that foreshadow later "antitypes", particularly centered on Jesus.

Understanding Biblical Types

A biblical type refers to a person, event, or institution that prefigures a greater reality yet to come.

Key Characteristics of Typology

Typology in the Bible stands out due to several defining features:

• Christ-Centered Focus: Types are ultimately meant to point to Jesus or aspects of His ministry. This sets typology apart from simple analogies or illustrations.
• Divine Intent: Types are not random but intentionally designed patterns. As David Baker explains:

  "A type is a biblical event, person, or institution which serves as an example or pattern for other events, persons, or institutions".

• Progressive Revelation: The fulfillment, or antitype, always surpasses the type in significance and meaning. This principle of intensification shows how the New Testament fulfillment is far greater than its Old Testament counterpart.

Major Types in Scripture

The Bible is filled with examples of types and their fulfillment in Christ. Here are a few:

These examples illustrate how Old Testament symbols and events anticipated the greater revelation of Christ in the New Testament.

Notable Examples

• The Joseph Narrative: Joseph’s life, marked by betrayal, suffering, and eventual redemption, reflects key aspects of Christ’s story.
• The Jonah Pattern: Jesus directly referenced Jonah’s three days in the fish as a foreshadowing of His death and resurrection.

Keith Poysti underscores the importance of this approach:

"Typology is the dominant and characteristic method of interpretation for the New Testament use of the Old Testament".

Theological Significance

The Typological Method demonstrates the unity of Scripture, revealing how God wove recurring themes throughout biblical history. Jean Daniélou captures this beautifully:

"The essence of typology is to show how past events are a figure of events to come".

This method helps readers grasp how New Testament authors understood Christ as the fulfillment of Old Testament promises. It provides a way to interpret Scripture that respects both its historical roots and its prophetic depth. Up next, we'll examine how these methods compare and their unique roles in shaping New Testament interpretation.

Comparing the Methods

The authors of the New Testament used three distinct methods to incorporate Old Testament texts. These approaches highlight various aspects of biblical interpretation while emphasizing the unified message of Scripture.

Core Characteristics

Strengths and Limitations Analysis

These methods provide unique insights into the theological depth of Scripture while affirming its divine authorship.

Theological Implications

Together, these interpretive approaches reveal the Bible's unified message and the layers of divine intent embedded within it. Michael Vlach captures this beautifully:

"The NT continues the OT storyline and affirms literal fulfillment of the OT promises and covenants in all their dimensions through two comings of Jesus".

J.I. Packer adds another dimension:

"Though God may have more to say to us from each text than its human writer had in mind, God's meaning is never less than his. What he means, God means."

Practical Application

These methods offer valuable guidance for studying Scripture, grounded in three key principles:

• Context: Always begin with the historical and literary context of a passage.
• Progressive Revelation: Follow how God's truth unfolds throughout the Bible.
• Christ-Centered Focus: Connect passages to Christ while respecting their original meaning.

Often, the best approach to biblical interpretation blends these methods. Richard Longenecker aptly notes:

"The Jewish roots of Christianity make it a priori likely that the exegetical procedures of the New Testament would resemble, at least to some extent, those of Judaism of the time."

This comparative framework provides a solid foundation for enriching biblical study and understanding.

Summary and Application

This section builds on earlier interpretive methods, offering practical guidance for applying them. To study how the New Testament uses the Old Testament, choose methods that align with your study objectives.

Choosing Your Study Approach

Here’s a quick guide to matching your study goals with the right method:

Select the method that best suits your focus before diving into practical steps.

Practical Implementation Guidelines

For effective interpretation, it’s essential to align your approach with your study goals. Arnold Fruchtenbaum underscores this point:

"It is incorrect to say that the Old Testament should be interpreted by the New Testament because if that is the case, the Old Testament had no meaning and seemed to be irrelevant to the ones to whom it was spoken. On the contrary, the validity of the New Testament is seen by how it conforms to what was already revealed in the Old Testament."

S. Lewis Johnson provides further clarity on typology:

"Typology is the study of spiritual correspondences between persons, events, and things within the historical framework of God's special revelation"

And Joseph P. Cahill reminds us of the centrality of Christ in typological studies:

"All the figures or types in the Old Testament coalesce into the one antitype, the person of Christ who is the one God, the one man, the one Lamb, the one tree of life, the one temple"

By combining these traditional methods with modern tools, you can enrich your study while staying rooted in sound principles.

Enhanced Study Tools

Consider using the Apologist app to enhance your study. It offers features like quick cross-translation access, journaling, and AI-driven biblical insights. Integrating these tools with traditional methods ensures a well-rounded approach while maintaining the unified, Christ-centered message of Scripture.

FAQs

How does the New Testament's use of the Old Testament shape our understanding of biblical prophecy?

The authors of the New Testament leaned heavily on the Old Testament to shape their understanding of biblical prophecy. A key method they used was a typological approach - where events, people, and themes from the Old Testament were seen as previews or foreshadowings of Jesus Christ’s life and mission. For instance, they interpreted passages about the Messiah’s suffering and resurrection as pointing directly to Jesus.

They also recognized that many Old Testament prophecies carried multiple layers of meaning. These prophecies often addressed immediate historical situations while simultaneously pointing toward future events. This perspective underscores the deep connection between the Old and New Testaments, offering a richer view of prophecy in the context of Christ’s mission and the overarching story of redemption.

Can the Typological Method be used to interpret Old Testament events not directly referenced in the New Testament?

Yes, the Typological Method can be applied to events in the Old Testament even if they aren’t directly referenced in the New Testament. Typology involves recognizing people, events, or institutions in the Old Testament that symbolically point to themes or fulfillments later revealed in the New Testament.

Take figures like Adam and Moses, for instance. They’re often viewed as "types" of Christ, highlighting themes like sin, redemption, and covenant. This method helps readers see the Bible as a unified story, revealing how its message unfolds and connects across both Testaments. Typology allows for a richer exploration of theological patterns and a deeper appreciation of Scripture’s continuity.

How does the Reinterpretation Method address concerns about changing the original meaning of Old Testament texts?

The Reinterpretation Method tackles the concern that Old Testament texts might lose their original meaning by emphasizing the connection between the Old and New Testaments. Supporters of this method believe it doesn’t alter the original intent but reveals deeper layers of meaning - often focusing on Christ-centered interpretations - that were always present within the text.

A good example of this is how New Testament writers employed typology and fulfilled prophecy to demonstrate how Old Testament passages pointed forward to Jesus. This method respects the historical and literary context of the Old Testament while offering a broader theological perspective that ties the two Testaments together. Instead of distorting the original meaning, the Reinterpretation Method showcases how these texts fit into a cohesive biblical story.

Related posts

• How to Study Bible Characters for Spiritual Growth
• 10 Steps for Using Bible Cross-References
• New Testament Authors' Use of Old Testament Texts
• How New Testament Authors Interpret Old Testament Law